justice in perspective

Latest Update

The conference adopted a series of resolutions in different commissions; however these were not officially endorsed by the government, and the institutions to deal with the transition were not established.

Click here to read more


TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE PROCESSES

Sovereign National Conference

Updated in October 2007


Truth and Reconciliation Commission

Updated in October 2007


International Criminal Court

Updated in January 2008


Message
  • There is no result.

Democratic Republic of Congo:

Sovereign National Conference

africa drcNAME OF MECHANISM

Sovereign National Conference (Alternative Process)

YEARS OF OPERATION

Opened sessions on the 7th August 1991; temporarily closed in January 2002 by Prime Minister Nguz-A-Karl-I-Bond; and then worked uninterrupted from April to December 2002.

MANDATE AND OPERATIONS

Mandate: Established by Mobutu’s government, under pressure of political parties (UDPS), CSOs and the International Community.

The conference claimed to be a democratic forum of all relevant forces of former Zaire, and was tasked with

1) interrogating the country’s history and question how and

2) finding a way to deal with the multidimensional crisis (political, economic, social, cultural and moral).

Outcome: Recommendations regarding the establishment of political institutions to manage the country’s transition to multiparty democracy.

Staff: Chaired by Catholic Archbishop Laurent Monsengwo Pasinya, the respected chair of the Bishops' Conference.

RESULTS

The conference adopted a series of resolutions in different commissions; however these were not officially endorsed by the government, and the institutions to deal with the transition were not established.

FINAL REPORT

Note: After the initial suspension of this conference, a protest entitled the “March of Hope” was organised by religious communities in order to advocate the re-opening of the conference. Unfortunately, 30 people were killed and hundreds injured during their attempt to resume the conference.

To access, a more detailed report of the events of 1992, please refer to the Human Rights Watch Report at:

http://www.hrw.org/reports/1993/WR93/ Afw-11.htm#P526_223500